I wanted to give everyone advance notice that I will be activating the requirement not long from now that you have to have a Fandom account to edit on this wiki. It isn't because of a problem with users. It's because we don't have a way of communicating with people who don't have an account without having to block them to get their attention.

Usually when a wiki turns off anonymous editing, it's because they're seeing a lot of poor edits by people who aren't logged in, so they think if they shut that off, it will fix the source of the problems. I know from first-hand experience that doesn't work. If someone is deliberately causing problems, they won't let being required to have an account stop them. They'll create an account and keep on doing it.

It's important to not view all poor edits as deliberate vandalism. It's important to give people a chance and the information that can help them from making edits that have to be cleaned up into being more useful and beneficial. Not everyone listens, but you still have to try.

The issue is that after the Unified Community Platform became active here, we lost that ability. UCP is the update and modernization of the wiki software that brings it back to the standard being used elsewhere. It has benefits and drawbacks, just as any major change does anywhere else. The drawback that's affecting us is Message Walls now only work for people with accounts. IP addresses don't have those. For example, if a person makes an edit from a computer with an address of, they no longer have a page at Message Wall:

That means we normally can't talk to them. The only ways we can are:

  1. We shut off the Message Wall and go back to having User Talk pages.
  2. A page like User: has to be created that explains what the problem is and/or gives them information, then they are be blocked. Inside the block reason, you provide a link back to that pseudo-Talk page and hope they click on the link to find out what's going on.

Neither is really a good option. The Message Wall provides consistency with how other parts of the wiki work. Turning it off means we go back to a method that's slowly being phased out.

The second one carries with it a kind of punishment that may not be intended. Even if the block is only for a couple of days so they've got a chance to see the notice, they can't respond to it until the block expires. Even if you say, "You didn't do anything wrong. We just needed to tell you how to do things a little better", it can be enough of a discouragement to them that they may not want to come back.

That leaves turning off anonymous editing. By requiring people to be logged into an account in order to edit here, if we do need to talk to them, they'll see the notification at the top of their screen. If they choose not to read it or they do read it and decide to ignore it, that's their decision. But at least we'll have a standardized way of reaching them without having to resort to a block just to get their attention.

This will likely be activated at the end of January to give people time to create an account.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.